Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Wed, 02 Jun 2004 11:18:22 -0500 (CDT) Return-Path: X-Original-To: gopher@complete.org Delivered-To: gopher@complete.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F8D2E8 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 11:18:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from glockenspiel.complete.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (glockenspiel [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id 30099-05 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 11:18:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from floodgap.com (netblock-66-159-214-137.dslextreme.com [66.159.214.137]) by glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20CC4F for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 11:18:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from spectre@localhost) by floodgap.com (8.9.1/2004.05.05) id JAA33878 for gopher@complete.org; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 09:32:42 -0700 From: Cameron Kaiser Message-Id: <200406021632.JAA33878@floodgap.com> Subject: [gopher] Re: NT Server? In-Reply-To: <20040602093002.8607C4F@glockenspiel.complete.org> from Andrew Mahan at "Jun 2, 4 02:29:57 am" To: gopher@complete.org Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 09:32:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL39 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at complete.org X-archive-position: 935 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: spectre@floodgap.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher > > This is likely going to be a problem for almost any gopher server in this > > situation, alas. If you have access to the source, a kludgey but workable > > solution is just to hardcode the proper address in it, if your box has an > > externally accessible IP. > So basically I am hardcoding each selector to point to the public ip on my > router, and forwarding tcp port 70 to my server? That's the way I'd do it, yes. -- ---------------------------------- personal: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ -- Cameron Kaiser, Floodgap Systems Ltd * So. Calif., USA * ckaiser@floodgap.com -- High explosives are applicable where truth and logic fail. -----------------